Consent and pornography and why sometimes no does not mean no An example of this might be an individual who is not a professional actor and who agreed to be paid a small sum of money, for participation in a hard-core pornographic film, where the amount paid was totally disproportionate to the actions they were required to perform or be subject to.
The annual gathering of the most prominent internet law lawyers and attorneys from across the world
From 09:00 until 17:00
At Aria Hotel, Las Vegas
The annual ICO conference with Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham CBE
From 08:30 until 17:00
At Manchester Central Convention Complex
Why sex workers don't report internet crimes and how we can protect a sex worker identity in court https://pornlawyer.co.uk/blog/protecting-sex-worker-identities-in-court
Is it harassment to troll a celebrity or an influencer?
https://www.harassmentlawyer.co.uk/tag/influencer-and-celebrity-harassment
Facebook has made a ton of rules against content that incites violence, spreads dangerous rumors or denigrates the victims of tragedies. A Wall Street Journal test found that it generally fails to enforce them in response to user reports. https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-has-made-lots-of-new-rules-this-year-it-doesnt-always-enforce-them-11602775676
In many cases is impossible to give valid consent due to controlling and coercive behavior by the video producer. Coercive behaviour is a criminal offence in the UK, which cerries a prison sentence.
Women are being waterboarded, strangled, suffocated, electrocuted, and worse in homemade “amateur” torture videos. There is no consent verified. These are crime scenes. Pornhub clearly doesn’t care as long as it brings them traffic/money. Shut it down
#Traffickinghub #Torturehub
Check out my latest article: http://yelp.com is Definitely Not Racist https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/yelpcom-definitely-racist-yair-cohen via @LinkedIn
Copyright © Cohen Davis Limited 2020. All rights reserved.
